Public Sector Transparency Initiatives and Financial Accountability Improvements
Keywords:
transparency, financial accountability, public sector, qualitative comparative analysis, open government, disclosure ecosystemsAbstract
This research investigates the relationship between public sector transparency initiatives and measurable improvements in financial accountability, proposing a novel
methodological framework that diverges from conventional econometric approaches.
While existing literature predominantly examines transparency through budgetary
disclosure or anti-corruption indices, this study introduces a multi-dimensional transparency construct integrating procedural visibility, participatory access, and algorithmic auditability of financial data flows. We develop and apply a hybrid evaluation
model combining qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) with social network analysis
of disclosure ecosystems across 42 municipal governments over a ten-year period. Our
methodology uniquely captures not only the presence of transparency mechanisms but
their structural integration into accountability feedback loops, including citizen oversight committees, real-time expenditure tracking platforms, and automated anomaly
detection systems. The findings reveal a non-linear, threshold-dependent relationship where transparency initiatives trigger significant accountability improvements only
when coupled with institutionalized response mechanisms and independent verification
capacities. Specifically, we identify a transparency-accountability efficacy threshold
beyond which marginal transparency gains produce diminishing returns, suggesting an
optimal transparency design point. Furthermore, the research uncovers the previously
undocumented role of ’transparency intermediaries’—civil society organizations and
media entities that translate raw disclosure into actionable accountability—as critical
moderating variables. The study contributes original theoretical insights by reconceptualizing transparency not as a static institutional characteristic but as a dynamic
process of information curation and response, with significant implications for the design of next-generation open government initiatives that move beyond mere disclosure
toward enforceable accountability.